xtratime Logo

[caption id="attachment_20709" align="aligncenter" width="580"] Narsingh missed Rio 2016. Pic india.gov.in[/caption] Internet Desk: The World Anti-Doping Agency won their fight against Indian wrestler Narsingh Yadav to keep him out of the Rio Olympics. Yesterday Court of Arbitration for Sports gave their verdict against Narsingh and banned him for four years. "To say I am devastated at the decision of CAS would be putting it mildly. I have gone through so much over the last two months off the mat but the thought of fighting for the glory of the nation at the Games had kept me going”, explained Narsingh about his present condition after listing the verdict of CAS. Narsingh was embroiled in a doping controversy in the run up to the Olympics, but was cleared by the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) ahead of the Games. National Anti-Doping Agency had ruled earlier this month that the freestyle wrestler was a victim of "sabotage", and cleared him to compete in Rio. WADA filed an urgent application before CAS to challenge the decision of NADA India to exonerate Yadav following two positive doping tests in June and July. The verdict of CAS gave a painful end to the sordid controversy which began with the wrestler failing a June 25 test. "The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) Panel did not accept the argument of the athlete that he was the victim of sabotage and noted that there was no evidence that he bore no fault, nor that the anti-doping rule violation was not intentional," CAS said, announcing a four-year period of ineligibility. More over the Indian wrestler is going to lose all his early awards and Medals as per CAS verdict. "Furthermore, all competitive results obtained by Narsingh Yadav from and including 25 June 2016 shall be disqualified, with all resulting consequences (including forfeiture of medals, points and prizes)”, CAS declared. However, Narsingh stated of fighting against the verdict. Already the Wrestling Federation of India has moved to CBI to probe the whole matter. "JSW Sports is deeply disappointed at the verdict of CAS in handing wrestler Narsingh Yadav a four-year ban following an appeal by WADA. Narsingh is, first and foremost, an athlete of India who we at JSW Sports proudly support and will continue doing so. Ever since he has earned a berth to represent the country at the Olympic Games, Narsingh has been put through an ordeal that no athlete should have to ever go through," JSW sports, the official sponsor of Narsingh,  said in a press statement. "This should not happen to any sportsperson in the future. I demand a CBI probe into the entire issue so that this episode is not repeated in the future," WFI President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh said. “My dream of competing and winning the country a medal at the Rio Olympics has been cruelly snatched away from me twelve hours before my first bout," said Narsingh adding, "But I will do everything it takes to prove my innocence. It is all I have left to fight for”. Meanwhile, IOA blamed Narsingh's compatriots for his suspension. "It's not a just loss for Narsingh at the Court of Arbitration for Sports but he was beaten by his compatriots who did not want to let him compete at the Olympics and not by his opponents," IOA secretary general Rajeev Mehta told PTI after the CAS verdict. "The picture is clear and neither I nor anyone has to say who's done the foul play. If you go back, you can easily connect the dots and would clearly know who could be the suspect. "As of now, the culprits have been successful in stopping him from the Olympics, though we may challenge the order and minimise the ban. It's a loss for the country." Further hinting at a conspiracy theory, Mehta added, "We must go deep into the matter and the government should initiate a CBI inquiry into the matter. It's not a small thing, it's plaguing our country's sport and we must nip this in the bud. "Days after he won the battle at the Delhi High Court, a phone call came from his SAI centre in Sonipat about some doping activities, the raid happened and his sample was found positive. It cannot be sheer coincidence."